CORRUPTION, TERRIBLE
THREATS APPARATUS FOR ADMINISTRATION
BY: H. SANTHOS WACHJOE
Prijambodo, SH.MH
PRELIMINARY
A paradigm shift in the
effort to eradicate corruption is more incentive to do to make the community
more aware of the dangers of corruption. Nevertheless, law enforcement and
prosecution of corruption that do not currently guarantee that corruption will
be increasingly eroded or even disappear from the Earth Indonesia.
Incessant efforts to
combat corruption have a significant impact for government personnel in
carrying out duties kedinasannya, especially with regard to the use of so good
that berumber state budget of APBN and APBD. As we know that in fiscal year
2015, uptake state budget both in the national budget and the budget is still
in the range of 25% - 30%, even though the budget year is already melweati
mid-year, it brings the effects of reduced volume development in Indonesia
which will indirectly cause berukurangnya the level of welfare.
Low absorption of state
budget can not be separated from their cowardice of the apparatus of government
in mengalokasian and using the state budget. The government officials are
caught in the paradigm of law enforcement in the field of combating corruption,
which led to government officials prefer to resign rather than having to use
the state budget.
Fear of government
officers in the use of the state budget is not only caused low volume
development of the country but also an impact on decreasing the level of
welfare because without economic development it would be costly and take a long
time in any economic activity. This causes people to be difficulties in meeting
hajad life so it will not create efficiency in social economy.
TERRIBLE THREATS
Nowadays, every
apparatus of government is in charge as Acting Budget User (PPA) will count
more careful in any policies that would use the state budget, as well as any
responsible government ditunjuka as Committing Officer (CO), more are choosing
to resign rather than having melaksnakan duties in the use of the state budget,
but leads to the hotel without cost for alleged corruption, so this time,
corruption has become a terrible threat for government personnel.
Indeed, if any
government officials have been carrying out its duties as outlined in his
TUPOKSI respectively, then certainly need not fear the threat of punishment due
to suspected corruption. In addition, each aparatu government has the authority
to make policy, wide open to discretionary measures taken along the policy is
in the interest of the public and not for profit-making private or group.
Keep in mind also the
existence of article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 as amended by Act No. 20 of 2001
on Corruption Eradication is considered a deadly weapon for each of the
apparatus of government in making decisions related to the use of the state
budget. It is necessary votes ter; prior to any policy of government personnel
in the use of the state budget, where the role of the State Administrative
Court can play an active role to judge whether the policy of the use of the
state budget from the state apparatus, either as PPA and CO can harm the
country, so that when a policy paratur countries in the use of state does
indicate the presence of state losses as stated in the decision of the state
Administrative Court (Administrative Court), the administrative court ruling
could be followed up by law enforcers, both KPK, the AGO and the Police to act
PRO Justitia, in order to save the financial country.
If the steps that
involve PTUN actually executed, it is no longer fears for the state apparatus
in a policy of use of the state budget, so it does not hamper the pace of
national development and the result of follow-up was the government able to
function in serving the public in an effort to meet hajad life.
At the next level of
development progresses, the public welfare increases and no further development
projects stopped or stalled because of allegations of corruption. Walahualam.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar