UNCLOS AND CHALLENGES LAW
ENFORCEMENT INDONESIAN MARINE
BY: H. SANTHOS WACHJOE P, SH.MH
A. INTRODUCTION
The life of society and the state
will not be separated from the inter-state relations, both bilateral (relations
between the two countries) or multilateral (the relationship between several
countries). International relations, other than for the purpose of achieving
the national goal of each country, as well as to protect wiayah each country
from the aggressive actions of other countries.
History has taught us that
Indonesia as a country surrounded by sea which is 70% of the country, Indonesia
has been famous as a country that rely on the sea as a means towards the glory
of the country. Starting from the emergence of small kingdoms in the
archipelago, until finally growing empire Sriwijaya in Palembang and Majapahit
in the ground area of eastern Java, these kingdoms made the sea as a place to
meet life and livelihood mereka.tetapi sea can also be a means to unite the
nation and also as a means of demonstrating the success and progress of a
country. Ancient royal era, there is an expression of who controls the seas
will rule the world.
This phrase at least proved, when
the kingdom of Srivijaya was the golden age, the countless number of
expeditions expansion of trade and expanding colony does. It is more severe in
terms of mastery of the sea by the Indonesian nation is when the heyday of
Majapahit kingdom, which is said memilki not less than 10,000 (ten thousand)
pieces of ships of war, not counting the number of vessels trading back and
forth to the whole territory of Majapahit and recorded as The second largest
sea power after the Mongol Empire in mainland China. The same thing happens in
a period of European imperialism, an unknown number of ships in circulation,
both warships and merchant ships belonging to the Europeans from different
countries who wandered expanding colonies.
A.1. DEFINITION OF SEA
In layman, the sea can be
interpreted as a whole series of saltwater that covered the entire surface of
the earth, but the meaning of the sea according to the legal definition is a
whole sea-related water freely across the surface of the earth.
So it can be interpreted that the
sea is a highway that connects transportation to all corners of the world
because by sea, the international community and the subjects of international
law that have an interest can perform legal acts in terms of shipping, trade to
the study of science.
Seafood, other than as a
sufficient means of life and livelihood of a people living in a region
surrounded by the sea, but the sea can be a symbol of the triumph of a nation
or country
A.2. MASTERY OF SEA
In Europe, Since the days of
Emperium Roman power is very broad, there is no other nation that dared to
oppose the provisions of the Roman Empire, including in terms of mastery of the
sea, which was once known two principles are strong, namely Res communis Omnium
that the sea is a heritage of belonging with the people man, so man (state)
should have it together and on the other hand, there is the principle of res
nullius saying that the sea should not be owned.
However, the sea is also true "first
come first serve" basis which means anyone who first came he was the
master, so that by the power of that era in the independent Roman Middle
oceans. After the collapse of the Roman, the law of the sea began to grow
rapidly with the emergence of new countries in mainland Europe, and there arose
a new problem about who owns the sea among countries developing it.
Law of the sea which is also part
of the norm, which according to Arief Sidarta, states that "The word comes
from the Latin NORM NORM, shows an order, prescription or order. But this reign
is not the only function of a norm for authorizing, permitting and pederogasian
is also a function of the norm ". Arief Sidarta goes on to say that
"She can have individual properties or general characteristics. He has an
individual nature when what is required is a piece of the behavior of certain
defined (restricted) individually from a particular person specified by a
person, eg the judge's decision, and Norma have common traits, if any defined
limits on an individual basis but rather a set of behavior behavior that limits
formulated in general terms, such as orders father to son ".
When Norma is formed and serves
as a means of regulating the livelihood of people, especially in the
relationship among countries in utilizing the sea, then the existence of
international maritime law dangat necessary existence so that with the
establishment of international maritime law in the form of the International
Convention (International Convention), requires each country requiring sea must
tunduj and adhere to the provisions of the Convention on the Law of the sea.
And thus will apply adegium "equality before the law" or equality
before the law and the law will be a role model in community life across the
country.
B. HISTORY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
OF SEA
In the context of the country's
sovereignty over the sea, the growth and development of international maritime
law after the collapse of the Roman Empire begins degan a demand made a number
of states or kingdoms over most of the sea that borders the shores reasons are
manifold, for example, Venetia claim most of the Adriatic sea, a demands
recognized by Pope Alexander III in the year 1177 is based on the authority
over the Adriatic sea is, Venetia levy on every ship that sailed there besides
Genoa also claims authority over the Ligurian sea and the surrounding areas as
well as take measures to implement it and the same thing performed by Pisa that
claim and take action on Thyrrhenia Sea.
The power that implemented by
states or kingdoms bordering the sea with its beaches is done with the purpose
of today might be called the interests of: (quarantine); (2) customs clearance;
(3) defense and neutrality.
H.M. Ali Mansur in his
Miscellaneous Legal Issues (Problems Agreement, Consumer and Pembaharuaan Law),
states that "In a State of Law, the rule of LAW should obtain the proper
place, the function of law in material sense which seeks to provide protection
for people with memperlaakukan every citizen has the right to work and a decent
living for humanity and provide top notch law for everyone. "
Law is a system that is important
in the implementation of a series of institutional power. The law will become
meaningless if human behavior is influenced by the law and if the public is to
use the law to obey his behavior. The law itself is divided into several areas,
namely criminal law or public law, civil law or personal law, and procedural
law, constitutional law the State, the law of State administration or
administrative law state, international law, customary law, Islamic law,
agrarian law, business law, and environmental law. Of these laws each have the
same goal, which is aimed at ensuring legal certainty in the community and the
law must also be based on justice, the principles of justice from the public.
Under international law, known as
the inter-state border into the separator from country to country and the
international border (international boundaries) can also be classified based on
their morphology or the process of formation. Based on the process of formation
of the border is divided into two parts:
1. Artifical Boundaries, namely
Border which marks the limit is manmade, the installation of this sign is
usually done after a negotiation, agreement and Border Pass in the Democratic
Republic of Timor-Leste and the Republic of Indonesia in the Prevention of
Illegal Border Crossing ", an agreement between countries. These
artificial boundaries can usually be stakes, monuments, canals, channels and
others;
2. Natural boundaries, which border
the boundary formed by the natural process;
3. Antropho-geographic
boundaries, which border this type are used to restrict the territories of
different languages, customs, religion and so forth are included in the
ethnic-cultural background which is a borderless nationality.
In the maritime field, attachment
and dependence of a State of the sea causes each country vying for control of
the oceans broadest, so it is not surprising that in the century imperialism,
the Europeans flocked across the sea in order to get the recognition that the
country they were the most severe in oceans so as to take marine products as
much as possible. This opens up space disputes between countries, which often
also involve armed force of each country that eventually led to the new
doctrines of law of the sea mastery, among others:
1. The concept of Open Sea (mare
liberium), this concept proposed by Hugo Crotius 1906 from the Netherlands,
"mare liberium" This explains that the sea is open and free to sail
by anyone;
2. The concept of a closed sea
(mare calussum), this concept put forward by John Selden in 1635.Teori was
stated in the seventeenth century by the British for opposing theories have
been put forward by Grotius. Selden argued that as long as the sea is
controlled by a particular country, then the country has power over the sea
(closed);
3. The concept of compromise,
from both the doctrine above, Pontanus try to combine "liberium mare"
and "mare claussum" and suggested that the sea is close to the
waterfront of a country (nation) is under the sovereignty of a coastal state
and the rest is free sea. So that was the beginning of the opinion of the
emergence of an idea known as "territorial waters and the high seas".
4. Theory cannon shot (mare
clausum) developed by Cornelis van Bynkershoek stating "terrae protestas
finitur finiturarmorum vis potato" or better known as the theory of cannon
fire, which states that the width of the territorial sea of a country is a
distance of 3 nautical miles. The reason is because the 3 nautical mile is the
farthest distance that can be reached by shellfire.
Several world-level meeting that
discussed about the management of the sea have been made, including:
1. The Hague Convention 1930:
The conference is aimed at
forming a codification of international law, initiated by the League of
Nations, which includes 3 important things are:
-
The territory of the (nationality)
-
Territorial sea (territorial waters)
-
The right of innocent passage
2. Truman Proclamation 28
September 1945:
Background underlying Truman
Proclamation release are:
a. The number of independent
state or declare independence;
b. Technology advances ;
c. Many countries are aware of
the sea as a natural resource potential.
In essence this proclamation
catapult new understanding about the regime Continental Shelf (Continental
Shelf). According to Truman, the continental shelf is a natural continuation of
the land area with the aim of securing and backing up natural resources and
control over natural resources beneath the absence of effective occupation.
3. Geneva Convention of 1958
(UNCLOS II):
The conference resulted in 4 of
the Convention, namely:
-
Convention on the territorial sea and contiguous zone
-
Convention on the high seas
-
Convention on fishery and protection of biological richness
-
Convention on the continental shelf
Based on the 1958 Geneva
Convention, then:
a. State of the geographical
aspects divided into two locked countries and coastal countries;
b. the sea is divided into
several zones, namely:
o the territorial sea
(territorial sea), the width is still under customary international law 3, 4,
and 6 miles;
o inland waters (internal water)
o additional zone (contiguous
zone)
o seas (high sea)
o seabed area and the land under
it, namely the continental shelf (continental self)
4. The United Nations Convention
on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS 1982):
This Convention was ratified on
December 10, 1982, in montegobay, Jamaica. Under the Convention produced some
important decisions, namely:
a. State of the geographical
aspect is divided into three: Negar locked, coastal countries and island states
b. Marine division is divided
into several zones, namely:
c. territorial sea (territorial
sea) as far as 12 miles from the baselines (baseline):
o inland waters (internal water);
o additional zone (contiguous
zone) 24 miles from the baselines;
o waters of the archipelago
(archipelagic water) measured from the outermost points of the outermost
islands an archipelago;
o the exclusive economic zone
(exclusive economic zone) 200 miles from the baselines seas (high sea);
o seabed areas: the continental
shelf and the region.
UNCLOS (United Nations Convention
on the Law of the Sea / UN Convention on Maritime) III which lasted from 1973
until 1982 and the Convention on Law of the Sea defines the rights and
responsibilities of the state in the use of the world's oceans and sets
guidelines for businesses, the environment, and the management of marine
natural resources. Kesimpulkan convention in 1982, replacing an international
treaty on the sea in 1958. UNCLOS enacted in 1994
The concept of the continental
shelf, was first proposed by the United States in the International Law of the
Sea Convention of 1958 that the President of the United States (US), Harry S.
Truman, who first proclaimed. Precisely post-World War II, on September 28,
1945. "Whereas the Government of the United States of America, aware of
the long-range world wide need for new sources of petroleum and other minerals,
holds the view the Efforts to discover and the make Reviews These new supplies
of available resources should be encouraged ... "said President Truman
started the proclamation which the concept of the continental shelf in the law
of the sea is not related to the mineral wealth in the seabed but related to
the biological richness or fisheries. Definition of the continental shelf was
first introduced by Odon de Buen a Spaniard in Fisheries Conference in Madrid
in 1926 and the conception of the continental shelf raised by fisheries based
on the assumption that the waters above the continental plateau is an excellent
waters for fish life.
International Law of the Sea
Convention or the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in
1982, provides the opportunity for the coastal States to perform a review of
the area of the continental shelf up to 350 nautical miles from the
baselines. Under the provisions of UNCLOS given distance is 200 nautical miles,
then the appropriate conditions in Indonesia has sought to make submissions
(submission) to the UN of Indonesia in the continental shelf beyond 200
nautical miles.
In the theory of international
law, there are several schools of thought which influenced the enactment of
International Law in the National Legal System in the State. The development of
theories of international law can not be separated from the ever increasing
needs of a State or on the sea and the resources contained in it, even a State
which naturally can not have the sea, for example Switzerland or Austria, still
need the sea, in addition to the need for resources that is in the sea, in
order to maintain the existence of the country is still in need of the sea.
Among the theories of
international law which develop from time to time are:
a. Theory of Natural Law / Law of
Nature
In the theory of natural law is
very strong religious characteristics, but after that by Grotius released from
his relationship with the religious. Here the law of nature is defined sebagia
ideal laws based on human nature as a creature who understands or unit inspired
rules of nature in human reason. Weaknesses Natural law theory is very vague
and depends on the subjective opinions of concerned about justice, the
interests of the international community and other similar concepts.
b. Volition Theory of State
(state will theory)
This theory explains that it is
the state that is the source of all law and international law binding on the
will states that want to subject themselves to international law. The weakness
of this theory is not able to answer a question, why is a new country, since
the rise in the international community is already bound by international law,
regardless of want or not he wants to submit to him.
c. The willingness of the Joint
State Theory (Common Will Theory, Vereinbarung Theorie)
This theory basically states that
international law is binding on those countries not because of the will of each
country to comply with international law, but rather because of the existence
of a common will for the countries subject to international law. A common will
is called vereinbarung. The weakness of this theory is the basis of binding
force of law based on the will of the subject of law was not acceptable.
d. Legal norms (sect Vienna)
This theory explains that,
essentially tying the basis of international law is not the will of the state,
but based on legal norms. A rule is basically based on the rules of higher
thereon so did so. And everything is returned to the basic rules, and the basic
rules adopted by these schools go round the principle "pacta sun
servanda". The weakness of this theory is unable to explain why the basic
rules itself binding. This resulted in a system that was logically be hung in
the air, because it may not issue binding force of international law it shares
based on a hypothesis.
e. Fait Social (Mazhab France)
French schools of basing tied to
a law including international law on biological factors, social and human
history which they named "the facts of international" (fait social).
So the basis of binding force of international law contained in the social
reality that bind law is absolutely necessary, to be able to fulfill the needs
of people (nation) to society.
f. The views Starke
According starke basic elements
that reinforce the mandatory rules of international law is the empirical fact
that countries are willing to insist on their rights according to the rules of
the country which he considers should obey the rules. In other words, at least
to some extent, the problem of international legal binding force eventually
melt himself into trouble is not that different from the problem of the nature
force of law in general.
From the theories of the
International Law, presumably to date no country that adheres purely from one
of these terori, because changing times requires States parties to be active in
the protection and management of the sea and the resources contained therein.
Therefore, each country tends to adopt some of these theories once in, the
implementation of marine protection.
Against an International
Convention, when a country has ratified an International Convention, means that
the state has recognized the International Convention on them and automatically
International Convention will be directly applicable as the National Law of the
country but in practice, particularly in Indonesia, the international
Conventions that have been ratified do not automatically apply as Indonesian
Law, but determined beforehand in the form of legislation which is then treated
as national law. An example is Act No. 15 of 2002 amended by Law No. 8 of 2010
on the Prevention and Combating of Money Laundering (Money Laudering) which is a
manifestation of the International Convention of the United Nations Conventions
Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 1988 and
Act No. 21 of 2007 on the Eradication of Trafficking in Persons (Human
Trafficking) which is a manifestation of the International Convention on the
Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially
Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention Against
transnational Organized Crime in 2004.
In the international marine law
as contained in UNCLOS III, which lasted from December 1973 until December
1982. The agreement reached during the UNCLOS convention I summarized in the
following four:
1. Convention on the High Seas,
namely the Convention on the High Seas. The Convention on the high seas begin
by defining the high seas to be, While this dichotomy reflects the thinking of
a more-or-less traditional "all parts of the sea that are not included in
the territorial sea or in inland waters of a State." At that time, it was
converted into tripartite division during UNCLOS III - the territorial sea,
exclusive economic zone and the high seas. The Convention on the high seas
continued to define certain liberties have been taken for granted: freedom of
navigation, freedom of fishing, freedom to lay submarine cables and pipelines,
and the freedom of overflight. An important caveat to these freedoms is a
provision that at least in the case of fishing rights, this warning marked a
significant "they must be conducted with respect to the fair to the
interests of other countries in their exercise of the freedom of the high
seas." Departures from the standpoint Grotian that the high seas are res
nullius.
2. Convention on the Territorial
Sea and the Additional Zone, namely the Convention on the Territorial Sea and
the Additional Zone. Article 1 of the Convention explicitly states, "The
sovereignty of the State extends, beyond the area of land and water
internally, to belt the sea adjacent to its coast, described as the territorial
sea." Despite the consensus codification Den Haag 1930 Conference was that
the sovereignty of the coastal state expanded into marine areas , this is the
first codification of this concept in an international agreement.
3. The Convention on the
Continental Shelf, which basically follows the convention of the main Truman
Proclamation and the subsequent claims the Middle several Latin American
countries. The Convention defines the continental shelf as "the adjacent
seabed and subsoil of the area under the sea to the coast but outside the
territorial waters, to a depth of 200 meters or, beyond that limit, to where
the depth of the superjacent waters admits of the exploitation of the natural
resources of the area the "and" the seabed and the land under it from
the area under the same sea adjacent to the coast of the islands.
"According to this convention, coastal states over the continental shelf
sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting its natural
resources. Natural resources are defined to include non-living resources, such
as minerals, and "living organisms belonging to the species settling,
saying, organisms which, at the stage of cut, either moving on or under the
seabed or unable to move except in physical contact constant with the seabed or
the subsoil. "The Convention specifically states that" the rights of
the coastal State over the continental shelf do not affect the legal status of
the superjacent waters as high seas, or that the airspace above those waters.
"One of the elements troublesome change convention on the continental
shelf out to be a problem settling species. Several years after the adoption of
the convention, a dispute arose between France and Brazil on lobster harvesting
in the Brazilian continental shelf. Japan also refused to recognize the crab as
species settled. Problems persist species eventually become moot with the
creation of the 200-mile exclusive economic zone by UNCLOS III.
4. Convention on Fishing and
Conservation of Natural Resources High Seas, namely the Convention appears to
be driven by two basic problems, first, the issues of over-exploitation, it is
expected that pressure from coastal states to extend their territorial sea may
be reduced and the second , countries that have signed an agreement to preserve
certain stocks want the agreement to be recognized in the convention.
Unfortunately, the convention has many shortcomings and in a short time
replaced by state practice.
Of UNCLOS III stretcher, then was
born the Declaration Juanda 1962 as an answer to the recognition of the
sovereignty of the Indonesian sea as island countries that have the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) of 200 nautical miles from bibr beach and the zone of
sovereignty ynag an Indonesian waters as far as 12 nautical miles from
shoreline and protect resources in the sea terkadung behalf of the citizens of
Indonesia. It is then manifested in Law No. 45 of 2009 on Fisheries which is an
amendment to Act No. 31 of 2004. On the basis of Law No. 45 Year 2009 on the
fisheries, maritime law enforcement efforts nationwide enforced. Law
Enforcement and the process is essentially a process to execute a legal product
in the form of legislation, both the Act and the regulations perudangan
underneath. An Act will not be able to run properly if Enforcement law is the
officials who did not understand the essence of the Act being operated. So
that, making the need for law enforcement authorities are really qualified in
carrying out his duties.
Law enforcement is the center of
the whole "life events" law from the planning law, law-making, law
enforcement and legal evaluation. Law enforcement is essentially an interaction
between the various human behaviors that represent different interests within
the framework of the rules that have been agreed. Therefore, law enforcement
can not be solely considered as the process of implementing the law as the
opinion of the legalistic.
Law enforcement should be
consistent so that people understand, where and where NOT LAW LAW. As part of
the process of social, enforcement of legal certainty it rests on two (2) main
components, namely:
1. The law must be able to
provide certainty in orientation to the community. In this case the known
certainty; namely Certitudo orientation or Orientierungssicherheit, that people
understand, how the behavior expected by others thereof and the response is
what they can expect from others it was to the behavior;
2. Certainty in the application
of the law by law enforcement, Do not let this happen that once a legal
provision is implemented, but other times the same requirements are not
implemented. There is a principle which is Securitas or Realisierungssherheit
is the principle of legal certainty reality that allows people to rely on the
calculations, that the norms in force is respected and implemented, court
decisions sincerely held and agreements are adhered to.
Judge as restated in Law Number
48 Year 2009 regarding Judicial Power has mentioned in Article 1 paragraph 1
that "Judicial Power is the power of a sovereign state to conduct
judiciary to uphold law and justice based on Pancasila and the Constitution of
the Republic of Indonesia in 1945, for the implementation of the State Law of
the Republic of Indonesia "and Article 1 paragraph 2, which states"
the Supreme Court is the judicial power executors as defined in the Basic Law
of the Republic of Indonesia year 1945 ".
C. CHALLENGE LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR INDONESIAN
SUPREME OF COURT
Judicial duties is the task of
prosecuting one part of the judicial process in an integrated manner is the
duty of a judge, both at the Court of first instance, court of appeal and in
the Supreme Court, but often judicial duties is not well understood by the
judge, so seroang Judges must understand their duties, namely:
1) Mengkonstatir is stated in the
Minutes of Hearing and in case his seat on the judge's decision. Mengkonstatir
is done by first looking at the subject matter and then admit or justify the
events proposed, but previously had held the proof in advance;
2) Mengkualifisir are set forth
in the legal reasoning in the decision letter. This is an assessment of the
events of the evidence, facts or events of legal facts and find legal;
3) Mengkonstituir is stated in
the decision letter. Phase three is the determination of the law or a
constitutional provision against the case.
In the law enforcement national
marine, although Indonesia has ratified UNCLOS III, by Act No. 17 of 1985, but
until now the government of Indonesia has not ratified the convention STCWF
1995 which is a derivative of UNCLOS III governing membership of the sailors as
evidenced by the certification kepelautan international standard STCWF 1995 to
acquire the rights and obligations of national and international, so the
sailors can compete with other foreign sailors and positions the master or
officer on ships - ships abroad. Ratification of the 1995 STCWF aims to:
1. To improve the standard of
education, training, certification and guard duty for fishing boats;
2. Positioning the crew of
fishing boats in order to gain recognition and job opportunities at the
international level;
3. To increase the quality of the
marine environment by engurangi occurrence of marine pollution due opersioanl
fishing vessels;
4. Improving the quality of
fishing by applying governance responsible fishing;
5. To improve the safety of life
at sea treasures.
Ratification STCWF 1995 is
expected to limit the entry of foreign crew members who do not have the
competence to be working in the Indonesian fishery ship and the condition is
very much in line with the policy of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
(MMAF) contained in Peppermint 56 and 57 in 2014.
Besides not ratified STCWF 1995,
p yag others in law enforcement sea in Indonesia, is the absence of sepemahaman
among law enforcement in Indonesia, especially the understanding of UNCLOS
specifically in Article 73 regulate law enforcement can be done by the coastal
State to a breach of the region sea. Learn Article 73 of UNCLOS states:
Article 73
Enforcement of laws and
regulations of the coastal State
(1) The coastal State may, in the
exercise of its sovereign rights to explore, exploit, conserve and manage the
source of biological richness in the exclusive economic zone, take such
measures, including boarding, check, capture and perform the judicial process,
as necessary to ensure compliance with laws -undangan which it adopted in
accordance with the provisions of this Convention;
(2) The ships were captured and
their crews must be immediately released after being given a decent bail or
other forms of collateral;
(3) Penalties imposed against the
coastal State violations of fisheries laws and regulations in the exclusive
economic zone may not include imprisonment, if no contrary agreement between
the States concerned, or any form of corporal punishment;
(4) In the event of the arrest or
detention of foreign vessels the coastal State shall promptly notify the flag
State, through appropriate channels, of the action taken and of any penalties
subsequently imposed.
Often there is a contradiction
between the law enforcement agencies with regard to the arrest of fishing
vessels with foreign flags in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Some argue
that the capture foreign ships and response to initial the ship, according to
Article 73 paragraph (3) should not drop criminal prosecution bodies including
the confinement but some argue that the nature of the confinement is different
from that imprisonment is a criminal prosecution body. It is that often cause
many different decisions between marine case with each other marine case,
although the substance was tried was the same.
Another thing that is also a
problem, particularly in the field of justice, is the lack of Judges who have
qualified fisheries and also the need for the establishment or formation of a
new Fisheries Tribunal so that all case management of fisheries is more
dispersed and evenly so as to facilitate and expedite the handling of the case
of fisheries.
The attention of the Supreme
Court of the existence of Fisheries Tribunal is necessary, given that currently
being pursued law enforcement against criminal acts of poaching (illegal
fishing) in Indonesian waters, which causes the loss of trillions of rupiah.
The Supreme Court needs to be more assertive against the perpetrators of the
crime of illegal fishing, including in the event that in Act No. 45 of 2009 on
Fisheries which is an amendment of the Act No. 31 of 2004, against the
perpetrators of illegal fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zone ( EEZ) in the
waters of Indonesia are carried out by foreigners (WNA) shall only be fined but
the penalty was not accompanied by a "means of coercion" of criminal
replacement in the form of imprisonment that can be used as a means of coercion
to foreign nationals who commit illegal fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zone
(EEZ) in the waters of Indonesia.
The absence of imprisonment as a
means of coercion for foreign citizens to pay a fine as a penalty for the
relevant because doing illegal fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in
the waters of Indonesia, causing judicial decisions in particular the decision
of the Supreme Court into a "toothless" because it does not can be
executed by the Attorney / Prosecutor General as the executor of the execution
of the judge's decision. It needs a clear concept of the criminalization of
foreigners who commit illegal fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in
the waters of Indonesia. It should also be noted that the perpetrators of the
theft of fish is often supported by the corporation in terms of providing
capital goods and equipment, so it would need to Supreme Court gave
understanding to the judges in the area especially judges certified fisheries
to also impose sanctions of punishment against corporations that make fish
theft primary in in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the waters of
Indonesia.
D. CONCLUSION
From these descriptions above, it
can be concluded as follows:
1. The Supreme Court of the
Republic of Indonesia and judicial bodies under an entity carrying on Judicial
Power in Indonesia should pay attention to the government's efforts to
eradicate illegal fishing, especially those committed by foreign nationals
(foreigners) in the in the Exclusive Economic Zone ( EEZ) in the waters of
Indonesia;
2. There should be equitable
existence Fisheries Courts and judges are certified fisheries in an effort to
enforce a criminal act of illegal fishing;
3. Law enforcement of the crime
of illegal fishing could not be carried out regardless of UNCLOS III which have
been ratified by Indonesia;
E. CONCLUSION
This brief article is probably
not enough inside to disseminate complete the UNCLOS and Fisheries Law
Enforcement Challenges in Indonesia, but at least shed some light on obstacles
to the enforcement of fisheries in Indonesia.
READING LIST F.
1. Sidarta Arief, Law and Logic,
1992, Publisher Alumni, Bandung;
2. M. Ali Mansour, Miscellaneous
Legal Issues (Problems Agreement, and Pembaharuaan Consumer Law, in cooperation
with Publisher Publisher Unisula Terrace, 2010;
3. Budioono Kusumohamidjojo,
Philosophy of Law (Order problematic Fair), Publisher CV. Mandar Maju - Bandung;
G. LINK INTERNET
1.
http://hukumunila.blogspot.co.id/2012/03/hukum-laut-internasional.html;
2.
http://hukumunila.blogspot.co.id/2012/03/hukum-laut-internasional.html;
3.
http://abdulfhunila13.blogspot.co.id/2015/04/hukum-laut-internasional_29.html;
4.
http://bahankuliyah.blogspot.co.id/2014/05/hukum-laut-internasional.html;
5.
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/346/1/2._ZUDAN.pdf;
6.
digilib.unila.ac.id/9166/11/BAB%20II.pdf;
7.
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konvensi_Perserikatan_Bangsa-Bangsa_tentang_Hukum_Laut;
8.
http://minartyplace.blogspot.co.id/2010/12/konsep-landas-kontinen-dalam-konvensi.html;
9.
http://hitamandbiru.blogspot.co.id/2012/07/teori-teori-dasar-berlakunya-hukum.html;
10.
https://yunushusein.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/12_pencegahan-pemberantasan-tppu-di-ind_x.pdf;.
11.
https://www.unodc.org/documents/middleeastandnorthafrica/organised-crime/UNITED_NATIONS_CONVENTION_AGAINST_TRANSNATIONAL_ORGANIZED_CRIME_AND_THE_PROTOCOLS_THERETO.pdf
;
12.
https://ekazai.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/sejarah-unclos-tahun-1982/;
13.
http://laliumah.blogspot.co.id/2013/02/tugas-fungsi-dan-tanggung-jawab-hakim.html;
14.
http://www.puslat.kkp.go.id/puslatweb/berita.php?mod=view&id=NWID000458;
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar